Webcom Radio is Now Playing: Leonard Cohen - Teachers

Through A Scottish Prism 29/05/22

This week my guests are Sara Saylers of SALVO and David Henry from SSRG. We discuss the possibility or not of SNP independence referendum in 2023. We also talk about different routes our movement can utilise to attain our freedom. Lots of interesting facts to be heard.

Later I am joined by Yvonne Ridley and Phil Boswell to discuss the topics of the week and how they effect Scotland. Nicola Sturgeon now Scotland’s longest serving First Minister, what are her legacy and achievements?

Unionists forming Council coalitions throughout Scotland. Many saw this outcome why didn’t the SNP or did they and controlling councils was not their prime objective last week?

Meanwhile down in England, Sue Gray Report us published and it was an appalling inditement of Johnson and his government.

Douglas Ross the flip flopper.

UK Government wanting to form a new Union with Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic States. It seems England just cannot stand the thought of standing on its own two feet!

Scottish Oil & Gas Revenues funding all of UK now undeniable!

The Platinium Jubilee and our guests plans for the event won’t come as a great surprise!

The fall out over Ricky Gervais Special.

All this and more from Noon Sunday.

Censorship is rife on social media including on Teitter and YouTube. Can you all please share this Prism on as many social media platforms as

 

 

19 thoughts on “Through A Scottish Prism 29/05/22

  • We all know English people who will vote for independence. They are in the Minority 1.2 million English settlers in Scotland their allegiance is to their Mother country England. The voting franchise should be for the indigenous population only. All foreigner settlers can be given citizenship in our new country after a successful yes vote. This in the UN international standard in constitutional voting franchise for Decolonisation. The important thing is that the settlers cannot subvert our democracy.

  • Very interesting stuff, chaps and chapesses. Sara and David put it so well: England is acting ultra vires towards Scotland, and has been since 1707. No ifs, no buts, that is the actual situation. It is beyond a disgrace for the SG to not face that truth and get us the hell out of the Union post haste. Even if none of them is actually au fait with the constitutional position, they must have those around them who do know or should make it their business to know or what is the point of these people – apart from draining our coffers? Thank you to both of them for all the hard work they have done and continue to do, and thanks to Roddy for publicising it.

    Yvonne and Phil as solid as ever, but, please, folks, don’t refer to TRAs as trans; they are ‘trans’ identified, which means absolutely nothing. No one can change sex, ergo ‘trans’ does not exist except in someone’s wee heid. The medical problems they encounter are down to the shortage of psychologists and psychiatrists required to deal with them. Very good points made by both contributors.

    No one is trying to minimise their pain and distress, but mutilating and pumping people full of drugs for what is a mental condition is madness. We all know people who have waited years for joint replacements, who are physically crippled by their pain, but they’re not cancelling people who make fun of elderly hop-alongs. Essentially, what we are witnessing is a social contagion feeding off a tiny number of body dysphorics and a large number of autogynephiles and sexual fetishists who are narcissists.

    Now, these might be distressing conditions to have, but they cannot be solved by forcing all females to shoulder their burden. Women have problems of their own for which there is not always an answer, so why the hell should we take on board the problems of this particular group who gaslight us and try to gain our sympathy by pretending to be us or pretending that they are not us?

    It is as much a social contagion as witch-hunting: based on nothing more than sheer hatred of women for crimes we have not even committed; but because, quite simply, we exist as women and girls. The people who run Stonewall and the other organisations are desperate to hold on to their fat salaries; the people who enable them are getting their rocks off on virtue signalling sanctimony; and the real b******s behind it all, the big money men, want even more money and power. Basically, they have unleashed an unwell and fetishised horde upon us as the witchfinders had every female in Scotland terrified of breathing too hard in case some malicious, vicious clype decided that they were witches. It was intolerable for us then, and is intolerable for us now, and is an act of cruelty and sexual sadism, as witch-hunting was.

  • Sara , David , Roddy , there is much made about alternatives to an indy ref and our ability to have one , and the avoidance of the fake indy FM to progress one despite NUMEROUS mandates from the electorate , it is encouraging to hear from Sara and SALVO , and David and SSRG that there are OTHER routes to our destination , CROWDFUNDERS all routes are long , require massive funding and require the mass education of Scots to EXPOSE how we have been wronged , lied too , abused and misinformed

    Sara notes that we can progress a case via the UN or the ECJ to take it away from the uk supreme Court as it is outwith their jurisdiction being under the COR , whichever way it would be taken requires LAWYERS and MASSIVE EXPENSE which would require ongoing CROWD FUNDERS which will severely impact on Scottish citizens , as we have found out already from our Martin Keatings foray where the SG DELIBERATELY and WILLFULLY interfered in the judicial process

    WHY , WHY should Scottish citizens have to find and BEG funding from ordinary citizens AGAINST a government that are NOT doing what they were elected to do and who have infinite resources (OURS) to BOTH fight AGAINST us and DEFEND their incompetence and ineptitude

    To have ANY HOPE of a legal challenge which IMO is IMPERATIVE we have to have the financial backing of the resources of the SG , to ensure a level playing field and ANY chance of progressing our case and to do that we have to do it as cheaply as possible but with as strong a case as the declaration of Arbroath and the CLAIM OF RIGHT

    TBC

  • I think it’s a fantastic idea to make a program about the 1707 Treaty of Union and all the shenanigans which went on. Lets face it, the truth will never be told on any Unionist’s watch.

    It’s just a suggestion, but does anybody watch Bruce Fummey’s YouTube channel? He’s a wee bit unorthodox but in a good way I think, but he’s also a born story teller, even when the story is pretty challenging to relate.

    It would even be good to think beyond YouTube, and maybe talk to Phantom Power and get something structured into a broadcast-able TV program., with some costume actors etc. Really go for it, and get Scotland’s Constitutional injustices right to the forefront of the Indy narrative.

    Knowledge is power, and maybe quite literally so for Scotland.

  • Aye Roddy, crowdfunder! It would be very interesting just to see whit wey the coort o session birls on this question. Are Scots a sovereign people or not and is our enforced EU-exit lawful in Scotland or is it not? This is no longer a hypothetical matter, and we have people ‘of standing’ (MPs) well able to progress such a case, however they do not seem too keen to do anything to make progress on independence. We have a treaty and a constitution including and conditional upon the Claim of Right for a reason, which also ‘safeguards’ Scots Law including the judiciary, and this should be dealt with, before our alliance partner, seemingly always acting in bad faith, swallows Scotland whole, including what is left of ‘Scots Law’ with it.

    • I also recall Michel Bernier stressing the importance that the Brexit process and how it had to be strictly legal and constitutional, and if Westminster’s actions were ultra vires and Scotland’s constitutional interests were compromised, I wonder what the ramifications might be.
      I do not expect Scotland to automatically qualify for EU membership, and out means out. But perhaps it wouldn’t be unreasonable to reconsider the holding pen status first mooted within hours of the Brexit result by Junckers and Verhoftstadt.

      It not unthinkable that Scotland might even find itself in a totally unique situation, a holding pen status that was an amalgamation; part EFTA, part EU, and partly in a type of Benelux arrangement as a legacy with the rump UK.

      Perhaps with some heavy investment in Scapa Flo, Scotland could perhaps become a hugely significant conduit for all global trade in and out of Western Europe, and exercising a degree of sovereign control envied by countries who lacked the benefits of Scotland’s strategic geography.

      Scotland could be the Istanbul of Western Europe, where global trade networks converge and connect, but developed with 21st Century technology which could give Scotland decades of guaranteed and peaceful prosperity while we wean ourselves off fossil fuels and embrace renewables.

      It could happen fast too. In 20 years, Scotland could be positively buzzing.

      Just as the Americans sometimes describe the UK as their unofficial aircraft carrier, it could be that Scotland becomes thought of as Europes heavy Container Terminal, with cargo ships docking in Scotland and breaking up their huge ocean going cargo loads into smaller ferries relaying through-trade in and out of Europe. The North Sea East of Scotland could be one of the busiest shipping lanes on the planet with Glasgow and Scapa Flo accommodating Atlantic shipping, and Aberdeen, Dundee, Rosyth, Leith and Cockenzie all developing ferry links with Europe.

      The sky’s the limit, or in Scotland’s case, maybe we should be saying the Sea’s the limit.

      Then again, the same strategic criteria also applies to Prestwick.

      Independence… what are waiting for Scotland? Wake up and open your eyes! Take control and be good to ourselves. When you see it, how utterly ridiculous is it for Scotland to be a stunted backwater, languishing in poverty as a rich man’s playground with failing communities, our diversity and culture under stress, and our natural flora and fauna despised and routinely slaughtered in the name of “sport”?

    • Alf , Roddy , Sara , David and Breeks , Alf you agree with Roddy’s call for a crowdfunder , the second half of my upthread comment was to repeat WHY should WE the sovereign people have to beggar ourselves and fellow countrymen to plead for funds to LEGALLY CHALLENGE a rogue government who have DELIBERATELY ignored the instructions of the people who elected them

      As the declaration of Arbroath STATES
      ‘For as long as a hundred of us remain alive, we will never on any conditions be subjected to the lordship of the English; for it is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we fight, but for freedom alone, which no good man gives up except with his life’.

      Mike Fenwick has produced a DECLARATION OF A SOVEREIGN SCOT which he is distributing on indy marches , what about the first 100 sovereign Scots who would donate £100 pounds each to facilitate a CHALLENGE to the SG to FUND and UNDERWRITE all legal expenses in pursuance of repudiating the NONSENSE of the sect 30 demand that Sturgeon insists on and also to repudiate the CLAIM by WM that parliament is sovereign

      This challenge would EMPHASISE and EXPOSE the INACTION and BETRAYAL of Sturgeon and her minions whilst also EMPHASISING and EXPOSING the LIE perpetrated by WM that parliament is sovereign , It would also give worldwide publicity to the sovereignty issue and the CLAIM OF RIGHT

      Using 100 Scots men and women who have signed the DECLARATION OF A SOVEREIGN SCOT would SYMBOLISE the TRUE meaning of the DECLARATION OF ARBROATH and would educate and highlight to ordinary Scots the power that they have in determining their own FUTURE and expose the lies and misinformation being constantly fed to them that politicians have the power over them

      It is OUTRAGEOUS that citizens who oppose the lie of WM that parliament is sovereign and who have a SG who will not challenge or expose the lie have to crowdfund and beg their fellow citizens for funds to legally challenge their elected government about their inaction and betrayal , but at the same time that same government is using our tax money to oppose our challenge and defend THEIR INACTION

      It has been said many times by many people that our constitution the Declaration of Arbroath and the Claim Of Right are the keys that UNLOCKS our freedom but we CANNOT UTILISE THEM until we rid ourselves of the BETRAYERS and COLLABORATORS and to do that we have to get them into court , as our Martin Keatings case showed this government deliberately and willfully caused unnecessary time wasting and excessive financial charges in an effort to defeat the case and eventually succeeded in sabotaging the outcome
      Are there any Scottish hero’s out there in the legal profession such as Gordon Dangerfield Robert Black QC or Joanna Cherry QC who are willing to SAVE their country Scotland and their fellow citizens from the corruption currently inflicted on us

  • Breeks/Alf?Sara/David/Roddy, etc.: I think that it might be possible to suss out people with the necessary expertise to help with the workload. For example, I am not convinced that all Scottish lawyers are wolverines; many will be; but some will be willing to act pro bono. Already, a great deal of initial work has been done by people who do see the truth of our situation. Imagine the kudos for a constitutional lawyer or two who were willing to take this on, the ultimate publicity. Also, thre will be law students who would be willing to do the donkey work that preparing a case will take.

    It is finding these people that will be the initial problem, but an advert in the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland might do the job – no flannel, just a straightforward resume of the facts and the need for help on a pro bono basis for Scotland’s sake and for the sake of the future survival of Scots Law in all its various manifestations. Most lawyers and former and retired lawyers take the Journal or subscribe on-line to it, and it itself is a rich source of information on constitutional matters, as well as on other legal fields. People in other fields of expertise, not directly related to the law, for example, many in ALBA and ISP could also be encouraged to help.

    Ordinary people with no legal expertise at all, can still research items if they are told what to look for, and this could come from people like Sara and David. It could be done, but it would need a great deal of pulling everything together and pooling all manner of resources – an overall managerial role – in the name of the people of Scotland. Of course, a large fund-raiser would also be necessary, but it could be an on-going project, long-term, using such monies as are available at any given time, and continuing the fund-raising effort.

  • Great Prism ; and comments ” guys ”

    The message is getting out there – in no small measure thanks to this site and the excellent guests and despite good and bad faith scepticism .

    The way some people talk about progressing our cause via the emphasis and routes suggested by SALVO ( Love that name !! ) and SSRG you would think it’s the equivalent of finding the Holy Grail of Nuclear Fusion ( or something even harder eg finding a Nu SNP MSP/MP with a functioning backbone . With a few notable exceptions – Hi Phil 🙂 ) .

    It’s not . What’s required – as Sara and others keep saying , is greater awareness of these things amongst our support and , ideally , the Scottish people generally , and the unbending intent of our representatives to hammer this message home .

    Listening to broadcasts like this and glancing sideways at the fatuous AIM cult worshipping display at the weekend – S. Hosiery’s utterly laughable ” YES Pledge ” ( * other brands of furniture polish are available * ) …..” And the pledge itself outright says no to transphobia, homophobia and misogyny, adding that there will be “zero-tolerance approach” to discrimination and prejudice. ” THIS is how they plan to approach the 300+ year old question of regaining Scotland’s Independence FFS ! – is to give credence to the Many Worlds theory propounded by some quantum physicists . How else to explain the completely different * realities ” we all experience ?
    I know which world I exist in : clue …..Nu SNP are nowhere to be found in it

  • Stuart Hosie wittering on about ‘respect’ is like the village bike shouting ‘hoor’ at the wee lassie who was up the duff by gendered person unknown. Hypocrisy, thy name is Hosie.

    • Lorna I actually laughed out loud at that , the hypocrisy of these people knows no bounds , and Robert H your humour is a breath of fresh air

      • Cheers T . Think you’ll agree we’re in a bit of a greet or laugh situation in bloodless n soilless , moon howling New Scotland 🙂

    • Indeed Lorna . We can only assume he ( and the other sundry * transgressors * ) was granted absolution by his queen , the Blessed St Nickels . In wunnerful NSNP Land some sinners are more worthy of redemption than others

      At least the superfine , hitherto speculated about in hushed tones NIC’S SECRET PLAN has now been revealed ……

      The strategy is to finger-point their way to Independence , Berate For Scotland , blind the opposition with virtue and in essence rely on the love ,respect and admiration – nay awe – the global population feel for N S

      • Ay, Robert, it’s not his transgressions that bother me; they’re his business; but the hypocrisy. Typical of the NuSNP. He’s not the only one: Mhairi Black with her Stonewall cross-dressing story time in schools, facilitating autogynephiles and worse to poison our children’s minds; Kirstie Blackman with her ‘trans’ bubble mentality that cannot stand up to scrutiny; and the likes of Alyn Smith and John Nicholson, actively enabling this stuff and passing it off as concern for transsexuals, when it is actually Queer Theory in action, courtesy of the NuSNP and vile Greens via Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater.

        That makes me sound like a latter-day John Knoxian Kirk meenister of the Reformation days, but there is a happy medium. This lot have swung the pendulum so far to the ‘mad’ left that they have landed us in QueerLand. Independence? Nah, according to Black, it’s not her priority. Out of the mouths of babes, eh? Too much, too young – and as middle-class as all the rest, believe it or not, despite the accent. The men, well… make you sick… but the women? Vichy females every one. Independence and Scotland’s well-being is a distant thought for these people who have ‘queered’ our fight for national freedom in favour of cross-dressers and autogynephiles. They should be proud – not. Now, they are boasting about laying aside money for a referendum we ain’t going to get or that we cannot win. All part of the service.

  • As we all sit waiting to be deluged with an absolute orgy of Britnat Jubillee media pyschophancy I picked this one up yesterday about the Royal paedophile Prince Andrew

    It is an extract from a statement from the Very Reverend Justin Welby –

    ” The Archbishop of Canterbury has told ITV News that Prince Andrew is “seeking to make amends” having settled his sexual abuse lawsuit and we must “learn to be a more open and forgiving society”

    And there we have it we must in the days before Queenie’s Jubillee extravaganza learn to be more open and forgiving.

    Amen to that then. Let us forgive Sir Jimmy Saville OBE and all the other royal establishment favourites. What after all is a, bit of child abuse when it comes to a Royal celebration. Puts the Royal celebration right into perspective.

  • Gavin: the very least that we might expect whilst on someone else’s blog is that you remain civil. What was that about? Roddy has never made any pretence of living in Scotland. Why should that rule him out of posting and commenting? Are you another ‘Wheesht for Indy”? type or are you trying to make some genuine point? If you are trying to make a point, then make it. What exactly has Roddy done or said that so exercises you, and where is your evidence?

    My own comments on here might seem condemnatory, but I have given reasons for why I made them, with evidence to back them up, and I certainly don’t feel smug for having made them; all I feel is despair that they have to be made at all. The people I have singled out have made, as a group, along with others, life in Scotland almost unbearable for many of the population, with their insane policies and spineless behaviour, while pocketing large salaries and expenses at vast cost to the taxpayer. Roddy has done you no personal harm or taken your shilling. Do explain, please.

  • Latest shit tonight is the settlers want the Juke of Sutherland’s statue removed from Ben Brackie so they can rewright history and pretend that nothing happened. The British Goverment committed genocide here and ethnic cleansing against the indigenous population to prevent further dissent in the Highlands, after the 45 rebellion. Crofts were burnt down and people where Inforceably removed from the land, their crofts where burnt down, some left to starve and die. The lucky were given a one way ticket to the colony’s.
    We the displaced should be able to claim reparations against the British state and the Juke of Sutherland for this crime against humanity. The Jukes Statue should stay to let the world know what happened here, 4 million people, community’s, lives ruined , sent into exile.
    Dissolve the Union.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.